Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Trumble v. Reinke et al
as 1:2014cv00256
Plaintiff:
Charles Trumble
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Randy Blades, Keith Yordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borner et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
G Peter Borner and Detra Borner
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Company of Arizona LLC , Kai Shan and Unknown Shan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderton v. Bannock County et al
as 4:2014cv00114
Plaintiff:
Bardell Joseph Anderton
Defendant:
Bannock County and Unknown/Unnamed Defendants 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plemmons v. Unknown Names of Eye Clinic Employs at Boise, ID VA
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Cleo Jerry Plemmons
Defendant:
Unknown Names of Eye Clinic Employs at Boise, ID VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farmers Group, Inc. v. Simpson et al
as 2:2013cv00464
Plaintiff:
Farmers Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Chris Simpson, Michele Willard, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Cardona-Rodriguez v. Named Unknown Agents
as 1:2013cv00328
Defendant:
Named Unknown Agents
Plaintiff:
Francisco Cardona-Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansell v. Wright et al
as 1:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Alan Mansell
Defendant:
Wright, Baird, Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yil Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2012cv00545
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2012cv00462
Petitioner:
Young Yil Jo
Respondent:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arredondo-Meza v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2012cv00461
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Arredondo-Meza
Respondent:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
