Cases
Cases 21 - 25 of 25
USA, et al v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-35474
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE, SAUK-SUIATTLE TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
S'Klallam, et al v. Lummi Indian Tribe, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35772
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOWER ELWHA BAND OF KLALLAMS, Lower Elwha Band of S'Klallams, JAMESTOWN BAND OF KLALLAMS, Jamestown Band of S'Klallams and PORT GAMBLE BAND CLALLAM, Pt. Gamble Band of S'Klallams
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee: TULALIP TRIBE
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: LUMMI INDIAN TRIBE
Real-party-in-interest: PUYALLUP TRIBE, MAKAH INDIAN TRIBE, SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE and others
USA v. State of Washington, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-35794
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON, SWINOMISH TRIBAL COMMUNITY, LUMMI NATION and others
Movant - Appellant: SAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Amicus Curiae: THE SNOHOMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS AND ITS CHAIRMAN MICHAEL C. EVANS
Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Kempthorne et al
as 2:2008cv00750
Plaintiff: Upper Skagit Indian Tribe
Defendant: Dirk Kempthorne, James Jones, Jr. and Maynard Jones
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Upper Skagit Tribe, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-35061
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee: UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellee: JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE, LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION and others
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
Cross-claimant - Appellee: SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?