Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Garcia et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 7:2014cv00311
Plaintiff:
Roberto Garcia and Melissa Garcia
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds , Richard Freymann and Laura Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vargas et al v. Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Marco A. Vargas and Flor M. Vargas
Defendant:
Travelers Lloyds of Texas Insurance Company and Carol A Brackman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gonzalez v. The Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company et al
as 4:2013cv02467
Plaintiff:
Patricio A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
The Hartford Lloyds Insurance Company and Mike Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vargas v. ASI Lloyds et al
as 5:2013cv00386
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds and Ben Snead
Plaintiff:
Marcell Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Vargas v. ASI Lloyds
as 7:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Vargas
Defendant:
ASI Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Vargas v. Allstate Texas Lloyds
as 7:2012cv00351
Plaintiff:
Ismael Vargas
Defendant:
Allstate Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Vargas v. NGM Insurance Company
as 4:2012cv01601
Plaintiff:
Jose Vargas
Defendant:
NGM Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vargas et al v. Scaffold Industry Company Risk Retention Group
as 1:2011cv00855
Plaintiff:
Erlinda Cerritos, Amado De Jesus Irias, Alex Joel Irias Acosta and others
Defendant:
International Managers, Inc. and Scaffold Industry Company Risk Retention Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
