Cases 1 - 10 of 30
v. IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE CELL PHONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY VERIZON WIRELESS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION(S) et al
as 1:2022sc01606
Not Classified By Court:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH ONE CELL PHONE ACCOUNT STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY VERIZON WIRELESS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 2703 FOR INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATION(S)
HOMOL et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
JESSICA HOMOL, DILLON PAUL HOMOL and HANNA HOMOL
Not Classified By Court:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, BERNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1905 Disclosure of Confidential Information
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00101
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
TODD LIGHTNER
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00102
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
HECTOR VELEZ
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 1:2019mc00105
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
KATHLEEN MILLS
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00103
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
MELVIN POWELL
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00100
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
JOSEPH GHATTAS
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00106
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00108
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER R. MURTHA
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
as 1:2019mc00107
In Re:
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM TO VERIZON WIRELESS
Petitioner:
HENRY P. STAWINSKI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
