Cases 31 - 40 of 55
United States v. Vigil
as 15-1058
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIMI M. VIGIL
Vigil v. Nice Cars, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2014cv01026
Plaintiff:
Paula Vigil
Defendant:
Nice Cars, L.L.C. and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sokolich v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services et al
as 1:2014cv00338
Plaintiff:
Julio Sokolich
Defendant:
Presbyterian Healthcare Services , Jayne McCormick, John Liljestrand and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Digital Recognition Network et al v. Herbert et al
as 2:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Digital Recognition Network and Vigilant Solutions
Defendant:
Gary Herbert and Sean D. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Vigil
as 14-8007
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROCCO VIGIL
Vigil-Lazo v. Holder
as 13-9594
Petitioner:
ROSANA VIGIL-LAZO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Vigil
as 12-1066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DENISE ANN VIGIL, AKA Denise Herrera-Ruiz
Grace Requires Understanding, et al v. Stevenson, et al
as 11-2201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACE REQUIRES UNDERSTANDING, INC., JAMES W. HARKNESS and IAN D. HARKNESS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKKI ROGERS, in her official capacity as Director, Developmental Disabilities Supports Division of the New Mexico Department of Health, ALFREDO VIGIL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the New Mexico Department of Health, KATHRYN FALLS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the New Mexico Human Services Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
