Torts - Injury Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
VIGIL v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20046
Plaintiff: CARMEN VIGIL
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MORGAN et al v. BAYER, CORP. et al
as 2:2018cv00836
Plaintiff: ASHLYN MORGAN , JENNIFER MORUA , HEATHER MOSLEY and others
Defendant: BAYER, CORP. , BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC , BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MESSIH et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05874
Plaintiff: SHUKRY MESSIH , VELMA HARBECK , ESTELLA SOLTZ and others
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION , SMITHKLINE BEACHMAN CORPORATION, DBA GLAXOCMITHKLINE and GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34816
Plaintiff: JOSE S. GOMEZ and POINT VIGILANCE CORP.
Defendant: FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
RABA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32054
Plaintiff: JOHN M. RABA
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
GRUBB v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv30390
Plaintiff: KERRY M. GRUBB
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
VIGIL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv52887
Plaintiff: LENORA P. VIGIL
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BARONE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38190
Plaintiff: ROBERT J. BARONE
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68812
Plaintiff: JOE S. VIGIL, JOE S. VIGIL, JOE S. VIGIL and others
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY MANUFACTURING CO., PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
VIGIL v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER et al
as 2:2009cv68813
Plaintiff: JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL, JOSEPH J. VIGIL and others
Defendant: THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER, THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PHILIP CAREY CORP., BRIGGS MANUFACTURING CO., AND PANACON CORP., A CORPORATION INCORPORATED UNDER and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff: OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?