Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Wal Mart Stores East, Inc.
as 6:2019cv01414
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores East, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv01037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
CLARK et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 5:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
LEAH NICOLE CLARK , MIKEAL CHAD CLARK , BROOKLYN P CLARK and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST INC and THOMAS DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Strickland v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv02402
Plaintiff:
Steve J Strickland
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. , Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOYNER et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 5:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE JOYNER and BETTY G BLOUNT
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC , WAL-MART STORES EAST LP and WAL-MART STORES EAST INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lopez-Pottberg v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
as 6:2011cv01943
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Lopez-Pottberg
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Melvin v. Blitz U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 8:2011cv02542
Plaintiff:
William Melvin
Defendant:
Blitz U.S.A., Inc. , LAM 2011 Holdings, LLC , Kinderhook Industries, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
