Cases 41 - 50 of 95
DE BARNES v. WALGREENS - STORE NO. 6367 et al
as 2:2014cv05446
Plaintiff:
TANIA NEPOMUCENO DE BARNES
Defendant:
WALGREENS - STORE NO. 6367 and WALGREENS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DEBOSE v. MCNEIL-PPC, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv03027
Plaintiff:
ANGELA W. DEBOSE
Defendant:
MCNEIL-PPC, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON and THE WALGREEN COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
WARD-ANDREW v. WALGREENS CO. et al
as 2:2014cv02508
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA WARD-ANDREW
Defendant:
WALGREENS CO. , WALGREENS FAMILY OF COMPANIES , WALGREEN HOME CARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEWIS v. WALGREENS et al
as 2:2014cv02119
Plaintiff:
DARLENE LEWIS
Defendant:
WALGREENS , WALGREEN DRUG STORES, INC. and WALGREEN EASTERN CO.,INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
YARUS v. WALGREEN CO.
as 2:2014cv01656
Plaintiff:
LANCE YARUS, D.O.
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
DIMOKA et al v. WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
as 2:2013cv04834
Plaintiff:
ANGELIKA DIMOKA and PAUL PAVLOU
Defendant:
WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roth et al v. Walgreen Eastern Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02357
Plaintiff:
William Roth and Carol Roth
Defendant:
Walgreen Eastern Co. Inc. and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J.H. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06550
Plaintiff:
J.H. , L.C. , K.C.H. and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. , GREENSTONE LLC , H.D. SMITH WHOLESALE DRUG CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COLON v. WALGREEN CO.
as 5:2012cv05555
Plaintiff:
DARLINE COLON
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CUEVAS v. WALGREEN CO. et al
as 2:2012cv05556
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE CUEVAS
Defendant:
WALGREEN EASTERN CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
