Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Paul Grondal, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35507
Defendant:
ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
Wapato Heritage, LLC,, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35147
Defendant:
ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
Paul Grondal, et al v. USA, et al
as 20-35694
Defendant:
ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC and GARY REYES
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. USA, et al
as 20-35357
Defendant:
ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC and GARY REYES
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Sandra Evan
as 11-35778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Mary Wynne
as 11-35697
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Movant - Appellant:
MARY TURGEON WYNNE
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Sandra Evan
as 11-35698
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Sandra Evan
as 11-35081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Daniel Gargan, et al
as 10-35348
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State
Defendant - Appellant:
DAN GARGAN, a citizen of Arizona
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. Sandra Evans, et al
as 10-35288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAPATO HERITAGE LLC, a Washington limited liability company, KENNETH EVANS, individual resident of Washington State, JOHN WAYNE JONES, individual resident of Washington State and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDRA D. EVANS, an individual not a resident of Washington State and DAN GARGAN, a citizen of Arizona
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
