Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pell et al v. Warden et al
as 3:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Ryan Pell, Holbert Pell and Diane Pell
Defendant:
Transport America and Jason Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warden v. Odile, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00288
Plaintiff:
Juanita D. Warden
Defendant:
Odile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warden v. RST Westwick LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
Cordarius Warden
Defendant:
RST Westwick LLC , Westwick Apartments, LLC , Westwick II Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warden v. Massie
as 3:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Makeshia Warden
Defendant:
Tena L. Massie and Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Booth et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00568
Plaintiff:
Sasha Booth , All Plaintiffs , Travis Booth and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzales et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00829
Plaintiff:
Grace A. Gonzales, Betty G. Maerker, Sylvian S. Carver, II and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wosk et al v. Bechtel National, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Toksim Wosk, All Plaintiffs, Brian Simonetti and others
Defendant:
Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Flour Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barnes et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00448
Plaintiff:
Allison Shree Barnes, Thomas Lewis Barnes, Clarence Beamon and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc., Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company of Georgia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
