Cases 71 - 80 of 4,349
Amos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Harold Ray Amos
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Deronville, Tyrell v. Warden of Florida State Prison
as 9:2024cv80148
Plaintiff:
Tyrell A. Deronville
Defendant:
Warden of Florida State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Figueroa v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Luis Ortiz Figueroa
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arroyo, Gerado v. Warden Love
as 9:2024cv80135
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Arroyo
Defendant:
Warden Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 6:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Davis v. Warden, RRM Orlando
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Richard Wyatt Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BREADON v. HEWETT
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
EMANUEL BREADON
Respondent:
WARDEN HEWETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atchley v. Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution
as 8:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Hal Maxim Atchley
Respondent:
Warden, Memphis Federal Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ulmer v. Warden, USP Coleman II
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Jerry Ben Ulmer
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richardson v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 5:2024cv00043
Petitioner:
Jerome Richardson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
