Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Orozco v. Valley et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alberto Lopez Orozco
Defendant:
Warden Randy Valley, Howard and Offsight Surgeon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Richardson
as 1:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Kent Williams
Respondent:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Steve Young, Warden Richardson, SGT. Smyth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinones v. IDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Julian Quinones
Defendant:
IDOC, ISMI and Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matuguina v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Brian John Matuguina
Respondent:
Warden Tyrell Davis, Boise Police, Ada Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BBlock v. Linze et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
William BBlock
Defendant:
Linze, Copeland, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Richardson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Erick Virgil Hall
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson, Dagoberto Martinez, Camron Duramus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friedli v. Richardson, et al.
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joshua Friedli
Defendant:
Richardson, Eliason, Patchet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogstad v. Richardson
as 1:2023cv00588
Petitioner:
Jesse Rogstad
Respondent:
Warden Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Campbell, et al.
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Walter Campbell, Director Atencio, Director Tewalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
