Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Agan v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00741
Plaintiff:
W.H. Agan
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc., Allegheny Teledyne Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International Inc. , SB Decking Inc. , Parker-Hannifan Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Honeywell International Inc. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Malone et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv00406
Defendant:
Genuine Parts Company, Crown Cork & Seal Company Inc., Crane Co. and others
Cross Defendant:
Ingersoll Rand Company, Trane US Inc., Hopeman Brothers Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Riley Power Inc., FMC Corporation, Sterling Fluid Systems (USA) LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Malone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dougherty et al v. A O Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01972
Plaintiff:
Francis J. Dougherty and Elizabeth F. Dougherty
Defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cross_claimant:
John Crane Inc.
Cross_defendant:
A O Smith Corporation, Armstrong International Inc., Bell & Gossett Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Rankins et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01715
Plaintiff:
Odell Rankins and Sarah Rankins
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Co. , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brandenburg et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01714
Plaintiff:
Rollin Brandenburg and Elaine Brandenburg
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , American Biltrite Co. , Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
American Biltrite Co. , Aurora Pump Company and Cleaver-Brooks Inc.
Cross_defendant:
American Biltrite Co. , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Atwood & Morrill Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Davies et al v. Aurora Pump Company et al
as 1:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
Randall C. Davies and Linda Davies
Defendant:
Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc., Carrier Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc.
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , Aurora Pump Company, BW/IP Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Allen et al v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01014
Plaintiff:
Jerry Allen and Lou Ann Allen
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
