Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Clyde Ward, et al v. MERS, et al
as 14-15491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLYDE WARD, CLYDE MCPHATTER, LEROY WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, WASHINGTON MUTUAL SECURITIES, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA and others
Kurt Marin, et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, et al
as 14-15223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KURT MARIN, MAURICE SYMONETTE, JAMES LITTLEJOHN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, WASHINGTON MUTUAL SECURITIES and WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA
Maurice Symonette v. MERS, et al
as 14-10953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE SYMONETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., WASHINGTON MUTUAL SECURITIES, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA and others
Ward et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 0:2013cv61554
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ward, Clyde McPhatter, Leroy Williams and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, Loan City Mortgage, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 Federal Mortgage Foreclosure
Ward et al v. JP Morgan Chace Bank et al
as 0:2013cv60834
Plaintiff:
Clyde Ward, Clyde McPhatter, Leroy Williams and others
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chace Bank, Loan City Mortgage, Washington Mutual Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 Federal Mortgage Foreclosure
Wes W. Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2009cv04048
Plaintiff:
Wes W. Johnson
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., David R. Endres, The Endres Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Wes W.Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv02145
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Wes W. Johnson and Does
Counter Defendant:
Zoes and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Counter Claimant:
Wes W. Johnson
ThirdParty Defendant:
David R. Endres, The Endres Law Firm, Quality Loan Service Corporation and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Wes W. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
