Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Merkle et al v. BASF Catalysts, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00315
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Honeywell International, Inc., John Crane, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn K. Merkle and Jack T. Merkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Reinbold v. Advance Auto Parts Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00605
Plaintiff:
Janice Reinbold
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation, American Optical Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Blackmer Pump Company , Industrial Holdings Corporation , Crane Co. and others
Cross_defendant:
Blackmer Pump Company , Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Air & Liquid System Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Douthitt et al v. Arvinmeritor, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00754
Plaintiff:
William Douthitt and Sonora Douthitt
Defendant:
Arvinmeritor, Inc., Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Heath et al v. Bechtel Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00329
Plaintiff:
Charles Heath and Virginia Heath
Defendant:
Bechtel Corporation, Boeing Co., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Diaz v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Allied Manufacturing Company, American Standard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Diaz v. A W Chesterton Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jesse Diaz and Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
A W Chesterton Inc, Allied Manufacturing Company, American Standard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Yates v. A. W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00659
Plaintiff:
Barbara Yates
Defendant:
A. W. Chesterton, Inc., Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Allied Manufacturing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
