Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Maddox v. Ruebart et al
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
Kimberly Maddox
Respondent:
William Ruebart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spikes v. Simpson
as 2:2023cv02128
Plaintiff:
Quiwaneca Spikes
Defendant:
I. Simpson, NDOC and William Ruebart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weslie Martin v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 23-15741
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESLIE MARTIN
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM GITTERE, Substituted for William Ruebart per #44 Order
Harvell v. Rigney et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Sean Harvell
Defendant:
Chet Rigney, Shane Brown, Curtis Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Gittere et al
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Warden William Gittere, William Ruebart, David Drummond and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D Welch
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Steve Sisolak, Tasheena S. Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emanuel v. Ruebart et al
as 3:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Troy Emanuel, Jr.
Defendant:
William Ruebart, Milke, Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Durand v. William Ruebart, et al
as 22-16582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM RUEBART, ELY STATE PRISON, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
