Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Willis McAllister v. Dispute Prevention and Resolut, et al
as 20-15168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIS C. MCALLISTER
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH W. HUNTER, (President/CEO), STEFAN M. REINKE, Esq., (Arbitrator) and DISPUTE PREVENTION AND RESOLUTION, INC., DBA DPR Hawaii
Defendant:
KELLY BRYANT
Willis McAllister v. Andrew Pepper, et al
as 20-15169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIS C. MCALLISTER
Defendant / Appellee:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, N.C., JACKSON LEWIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ADECCO SWITZERLAND and others
McAllister v. Pepper Esq. et al
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Adecco-Florida U.S.A., Chris Adams, Adecco-Hawaii, U.S.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Willis C. McAllister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Willis McAllister v. DPR Hawaii, et al
as 19-17192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIS C. MCALLISTER
Defendant / Appellee:
KELLY BRYANT, KEITH W. HUNTER, (President/CEO), STEFAN M. REINKE, (Arbitrator) and others
Willis McAllister v. Curtis Brunk, et al
as 19-17100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIS C. MCALLISTER
Defendant / Appellee:
TRANE U.S. INC., CURTIS L. BRUNK and ADECCO USA, INC.
McAllister v. Dispute Prevention and Resolution, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00497
Plaintiff:
Willis C. McAllister
Defendant:
Dispute Prevention and Resolution, Inc., Keith W. Hunter, Stefan M. Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-15017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
