Cases 11 - 20 of 58
IVY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2019cv00185
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
ANN IVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2019cv00103
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Plaintiff:
BETTY MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOORE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00062
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, Industrial Revolution, Inc. and INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION INC
Plaintiff:
ANGELA MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVY COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00100
Plaintiff:
LEVY COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA LP, PURDUE PHARMA INC, THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2018cv00046
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Plaintiff:
BARBARA OLSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOWNING v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 3:2017cv00221
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Plaintiff:
SHIZUE DOWNING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 5:2015cv00275
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Plaintiff:
Leah Nicole Clark, Mikeal Chad Clark, jackson c clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLARK et al v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 5:2015cv00276
Plaintiff:
LEAH NICOLE CLARK , MIKEAL CHAD CLARK , BROOKLYN P CLARK and others
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST INC and THOMAS DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
Leah Nicole Clark and Mikeal Chad Clark
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CALLOWAY et al v. WALMART STORES EAST LP et al
as 4:2015cv00351
Plaintiff:
BEVELYN CALLOWAY and ANTHONY CALLOWAY
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST LP and WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
