Cases 21 - 30 of 34
SNOKE et al v. ESCALADE SPORTS INC et al
as 1:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
DONALD D SNOKE and JANICE SNOKE
Defendant:
ESCALADE SPORTS INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BILLINGS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BILLINGS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH-DYKE v. DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv00459
Plaintiff:
LUCRETIA SMITH-DYKE
Defendant:
DAISY MANUFACTURING COMPANY , WAL-MART STORES INC and WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONAGHAN v. WAL-MART
as 2:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. MONAGHAN
Defendant:
WAL-MART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROCKWELL v. WAL-MART STORES INC
as 2:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
CONNIE ROCKWELL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 2:2010cv00182
Plaintiff:
MARYANNE ROY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
as 1:2008cv00404
Plaintiff:
JEANNIE C CARSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TICE et al v. TAIWAN SHIN YEH ENTERPRISE CO LTD et al
as 2:2008cv00168
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE TICE and DANA TICE
Defendant:
MEREDITH CORPORATION/BETTER HOMES & GARDENS and WAL-MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JENKINS v. WAL MART STORES INC
as 1:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE JENKINS
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUSSELL v. WAL MART STORES INC
as 2:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
SHARON RUSSELL
Defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC and CLH AND SONS INC
Thirdparty_defendant:
CLH AND SON INC
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
WAL MART STORES INC
Counter_claimant:
CLH AND SON INC
Counter_defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cross_claimant:
CLH AND SONS INC
Cross_defendant:
WAL MART STORES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
