Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Duncan v. Walgreen Company
as 6:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Michelle Duncan
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers-Bell et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2011cv80478
Plaintiff:
Mary Rogers-Bell and Ossie Bell
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levine v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2011cv80477
Plaintiff:
Anna M Levine
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cusmano v. Walgreen Company et al
as 8:2010cv01787
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cusmano
Defendant:
Walgreen Company and L.N.K. International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schneider v. Walgreen Company
as 2:2010cv00139
Plaintiff:
Steve Schneider
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Snyder v. Walgreen Company
as 6:2010cv00033
Plaintiff:
Doris Snyder
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
De Cespedes v. Walgreens Company
as 1:2009cv23548
Plaintiff:
Amanda De Cespedes
Defendant:
Walgreens Company, Walgreens Company and Walgreens Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv21398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Atico International USA, Inc. et al v. Luv N' Care, Ltd. et al
as 0:2009cv60397
Plaintiff:
Atico International USA, Inc. and Walgreen Company
Defendant:
Luv N' Care, Ltd. and Admar International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv60183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
