Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Karon et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Incorporated et al
as 9:2020cv80779
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Sandoz Incorporated, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Karon and Adam Karon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2017cv80478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Galoppi v. The Walgreen Company et al
as 1:2014cv24178
Defendant:
The Walgreen Company
Plaintiff:
Mabel Galoppi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paugh v. Walgreen Company
as 1:2012cv21229
Plaintiff:
Belen Paugh
Defendant:
Walgreen Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers-Bell et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2011cv80478
Plaintiff:
Mary Rogers-Bell and Ossie Bell
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Levine v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2011cv80477
Plaintiff:
Anna M Levine
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation , Glaxosmithkline PLC, Glaxo Wellcome UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De Cespedes v. Walgreens Company
as 1:2009cv23548
Plaintiff:
Amanda De Cespedes
Defendant:
Walgreens Company, Walgreens Company and Walgreens Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv21398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
