Cases 1 - 10 of 98
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
KLAYMAN v. RAO et al
as 1:2023cv01606
Plaintiff:
LARRY KLAYMAN
Defendant:
NEOMI RAO, ROBERT L. WILKINS, KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
USA v. Aaron Walker
as 23-3007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
Aaron Walker
WALKER v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 1:2022mc00123
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL
Petitioner:
ASHLEY WALKER
Anwar Sadat Akkad El v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 22-1042
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anwar Sadat Akkad El, a/k/a Edward Walker Benifield El
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Larry Klayman v. Neomi Rao, et al
as 21-5269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Neomi Rao, Hon., Robert Leon Wilkins, Hon., Laurence H. Silberman, Hon. and others
Yi Tai Shao v. John Roberts, et al
as 21-5210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice and others
MUSGRAVE v. MANGER et al
as 1:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MUSGRAVE
Defendant:
J. THOMAS MANGER, CAPITOL POLICE, WILLIAM J. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN et al v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv01778
Defendant:
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and DEBRA HAALAND
Plaintiff:
CLARE STAPLES, SKYDOG RANCH & SANCTUARY, AMERICAN WILD HORSE CAMPAIGN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
James Walker v. Michael Regan
as 21-5070
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James T. Walker, Dr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
