Cases 21 - 30 of 2,762
Rincon-Puello v. Warden - FCC Coleman Low
as 8:2024cv00598
Petitioner:
Juan Rincon-Puello
Respondent:
Warden - FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner:
JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Davidovic v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Ronald Davidovic
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Derrick M. Morris
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Amos v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Harold Ray Amos
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Figueroa v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 5:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Luis Ortiz Figueroa
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wooden v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
as 5:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
James Wooden
Defendant:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium
as 8:2024cv00199
Petitioner:
Gabriel Rivera-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jennifer A. Broton and Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
James Martin Graham
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
