Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Darrell LawIn re: Darrell Law
as 20-2208
Respondent:
UNKNOWN DOCTOR, MEDICAL PROVIDER HOLLIS, MEDICAL GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE and others
Petitioner:
In re: DARRELL LAW
Shamsidin Ali v. Delaware Department of Correct, et al
as 20-1173
Defendant / Appellee:
ADMINISTRATOR RONALD HOLSTERMAN, In their individual and official capa, DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COMMISSIONER ROBERT COUPE, In their individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT SAUNDERS and ROBERT SAUNDERS, AKA Shamsidin Ali
Darrell Law v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-2474
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DANA METZGER, COMMISSIONER PERRY PHELPS and WARDEN DAVID PIERCE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL LAW
Donald Simmons v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-2287
Defendant:
CONNECTION CORRECTIONS HEALTHCARE, WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, DR. MARC D. RICHMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD J. SIMMONS
James Biggins v. Matt Denn, et al
as 19-2095
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KLINE, ROBERT COUPE, LEANN DUNN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM MARTIN, Paralegal II, DANA METZGER, Warden, STANLEY BAYNARD, Internal Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
James Hall v. David Pierce, et al
as 19-1273
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. AUSTIN, WARDEN DAVID PIERCE and COMMISSIONER PHELPS
Defendant:
SGT. D. DOANE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES HALL
Millard Price v. Robert Coupe, et al
as 19-1247
Defendant:
LARRY SAVAGE, Corrections Lieutenant, KATRINA BURLEY, Corrections Lieutenant, STEVEN BILBROUGH, Corrections Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MILLARD E. PRICE
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT COUPE, Commissioner of Corrections, RALPH BAILEY, Corrections Sergeant and WARDEN DAVID PIERCE
In re: Thomas E. Noble
as 16-1508
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, DIANE C. STREET, M. JANE BRADY and others
Nominal Respondent:
SUE L. ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
