Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Hatlen v. Cox et al
as 3:2012cv00384
Defendant:
Afeaki, Scott Alexander, Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Hatlen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOT USED
as 2:2012cv01030
Petitioner:
Johnny Edward McMahon
Respondent:
Warden Neven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estrada v. Neven et al
as 2:2012cv00931
Defendant:
R. Bannister, L. Cadams, Dr. Haranas and others
Plaintiff:
Gustavo C. Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cepero v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 3:2012cv00263
Plaintiff:
Billy Cepero
Defendant:
Fowler, Gerke, High Desert State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risser v. Nevens
as 2:2011cv01752
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Nevens
Petitioner:
Robert A. Risser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthews v. Nevens et al
as 2:2011cv01443
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Warden Nevens
Petitioner:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Nevens et al
as 2:2011cv01152
Defendant:
Doctor at High Desert State Prison, High Desert State Prison and Warden Nevens
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forsythe v. State Of Nevada et al
as 2:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
Larry Forsythe
Defendant:
Jones, N.D.O.C., Warden Neven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Reberger et al
as 2:2010cv02022
Defendant:
Greg Cox, William Kuloloia, Cole Morrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odoms v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2010cv01785
Defendant:
HDSP Warden Neven, Director of NDOC Howard Skolnik and State of Nevada
Plaintiff:
John B. Odoms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
