Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Mims v. Kirk et al
as 2:2022cv14410
Plaintiff:
Craig Mims and Juju Beatz
Defendant:
Jonathan Lyndale Kirk, Rodrick Wayne Moore, Jr, Ross Joseph Portaro, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Atlantic Recording Corporation et al v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv22951
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Recording Corporation, Atlantic Records Group LLC, Warner Records Inc. and others
Defendant:
VITAL PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., d/b/a BANG ENERGY, Jack Owoc, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
UMG Recordings, Inc. et al v. Bright House Networks, LLC.
as 8:2019cv00710
Plaintiff:
EMI Mills Music, Inc., Universal Music Publishing Inc., Universal Music Corp. and others
Defendant:
Bright House Networks, LLC.
Respondent:
Advance Publications, Inc., Sabin, Bermant, and Gould LLP and Jerry Birenz
3Rd Party Defendant:
Charter Communications, Inc., Ronald Hughes, Robert Kuszmar and others
Interested Party:
MarkMonitor, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Judge S. James Otero and Raymond Zink
Counter Defendant:
W Chappell Music Corp.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Nealy et al v. Caren et al
as 1:2018cv25474
Plaintiff:
Music Specialist, Inc. and Sherman Nealy
Defendant:
Artist Publishing Group, L.L.C., Atlantic Recording Corporation, Warner Chappell Music, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Baker et al v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv22403
Plaintiff:
Garfield Baker and Byron Smith
Defendant:
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. , Atlantic Recording Corporation, Artist Publishing Group, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pandisc Music Corp. et al v. 321 Music, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2009cv20505
Plaintiff:
Pandisc Music Corp., Pandisc Music Corp., Whooping Crane Music, Inc. and others
Defendant:
321 Music, L.L.C., Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., Atlantic Recording Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
