Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Watts v. Valley
as 1:2022cv00016
Petitioner:
Cameron D Watts
Respondent:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watts v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00272
Plaintiff:
Danny Watts
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Starbucks Coffee Company Store #11259 and Does I-V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charboneau v. Secretary of State et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jamie Dean Charboneau
Defendant:
Secretary of State, Jerome County Commissioners, Jerome County Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omnipure Filter Company, Inc. v. Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00528
Plaintiff:
Omnipure Filter Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Watts Water Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Watts Water Technologies, Inc. , Pentair Residential Filtration, LLC , Pentair Water Treatment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lords et al v. New Leaf Properties, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lords and Siswanti Lords
Defendant:
Eric Watte, New Leaf Properties, LLC and Glen D Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Watts v. Wengler
as 1:2012cv00215
Petitioner:
Cameron D Watts
Respondent:
Tim Wengler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blanc v. Jerome County et al
as 4:2011cv00345
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A Blanc
Defendant:
Jerome County, Cheryl Watts and John and Jane Does 1- 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Johnson et al
as 3:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
William Gray
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Kim Spaulding, Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Valdez, et al
as 1:2010cv00120
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Daniel Prado, Shane Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
