Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Weber v. Little et al
as 1:2018cv00867
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Weber
Defendant:
Michael S. Little and Timothy T. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00700
Plaintiff:
Quentin T. Jones
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections, Michael Stanford, Darold Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weber v. Quinlan et al
as 1:2018cv00637
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Weber
Defendant:
Amy Arnott Quinlan, John Carney, Matt Denn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. Weber et al
as 1:2017cv01246
Plaintiff:
Glenn A. Carson
Defendant:
Mark D. Weber, Herbert M. Gardner, William J. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
JS Halberstam Irrevocable Grantor Trust v. Supreme Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01226
Plaintiff:
JS Halberstam Irrevocable Grantor Trust
Defendant:
Supreme Industries, Inc., Mark D. Weber, Herbert M. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Tola v. Supreme Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tola
Defendant:
Supreme Industries, Inc., Herbert M. Gardner, William J. Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gold v. Forestar Group Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00779
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gold
Defendant:
Forestar Group Inc., Phillip J. Weber, James A. Rubright and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Robert Sellers v. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Robert Sellers
Defendant:
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation , Darin G. Billerbeck , John E. Bourgoin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weber v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00506
Petitioner:
Paul E. Weber
Respondent:
David Pierce and Matthew Denn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nottenkamper v. Modany et al
as 1:2014cv00672
Plaintiff:
Janice Nottenkamper
Defendant:
Kevin M. Modany, Daniel M. Fitzpatrick, John F. Cozzi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
