Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Garrett et al v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01697
Plaintiff:
Michelle Garrett and Richard L. Garrett
Defendant:
BNC Mortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A. and others
Movant:
Deborah Alex-Saunders
Garrett et al v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013mi00061
Plaintiff:
Michelle Garrett and Richard L. Garrett
Defendant:
BNC Mortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A. and others
Movant:
Deborah Alex-Saunders
MCINERNEY et al v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC et al
as 3:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
PETER MCINERNEY and KELLY MCINERNEY
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC , WELLS FARGO BANK NA and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00312
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wallace v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04172
Plaintiff:
Darlene M. Wallace
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. and Aldridge Connors, LLP
SANFORD v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC et al
as 5:2012cv00353
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SANFORD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE INC and MIKE HEID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanberry v. US Bank et al
as 1:2012cv02304
Plaintiff:
William Stanberry
Defendant:
US Bank and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Vakili et al v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
as 2:2012cv00104
Plaintiff:
Abbas Vakili and Parvin Vakili
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Latouche v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01403
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Latouche
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Fisher v. CitiMortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01026
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. , Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
