Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jamielynn Cota et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 3:2016cv05543
Plaintiff:
Jamielynn Cota , Susana Davila and Patty Cha
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Michael Reza et al v. Homeservices Lending LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01967
Defendant:
Does, Doherty Employment Group Inc, Homeservices Lending LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Doherty Employment Group Inc, Homeservices Lending LLC and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Counter Defendant:
Michael Reza and Jeff Uniack
Plaintiff:
Michael Reza and Jeff Uniack
Herrera et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 3:2011cv01485
Plaintiff:
Tania Herrera and Shamina Khan
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Herrera et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 4:2011cv01485
Plaintiff:
Tania Herrera and Shamina Khan
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Maggie Paniagua v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 2:2011cv01471
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Maggie Paniagua
Valda Taylor v. Aerotek Inc et al
as 2:2010cv06922
Defendant:
Aerotek Inc, Does, Wells Fargo & Company and others
Plaintiff:
Valda Taylor
Renee Gagliano et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 5:2010cv01378
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Renee Gagliano, Richard Phipps and Jeanne Wells
Bhalla et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 3:2010cv03452
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Bhalla, Scott C. Treff, Dean Kerr Ewing and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Bhalla et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
as 5:2010cv03452
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Bhalla , Scott C. Treff , Dean Kerr Ewing and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharon Y Sosa et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Ankur Baishya, Irina Barbarov, Natalie Daliah Barrantes and others
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.