Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Keith Judd, et al v. Barack Obama, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-57177
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH JUDD, ORLY TAITZ, THOMAS G. MACLERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK OBAMA, in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the US President in 2012 election, NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State, DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State and others
Cary Berger, et al v. Comcast of Pennsylvania/Washin
as 11-35946
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARY E. BERGER and K.C. CHARLES, INC., a Washington corporation, on their behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: COMCAST OF PENNSYLVANIA/WASHINGTON/WEST VIRGINIA LP
City of Roseville Employees' R, et al v. Orloff Fam Tr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35455
Plaintiff - Appellee: CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, LOCAL 282 PENSION TRUST FUND AND SAGINAW POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, SAGINAW POLICE AND FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Objector - Appellant: ORLOFF FAM TR UAD 12/31/01 MARSHALL J. ORLOFF & ANN S. ORLOFF TTEES
Defendant - Appellee: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., STEVEN R. APPLETON, WILBUR G. STOVER, Jr. and others
Adam Richards, et al v. Ed Prieto, et al
as 11-16255
Amicus Curiae: MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTION NETWORK, NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, ADAM RICHARDS, CALGUNS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF YOLO and ED PRIETO
Edward Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
as 10-56971
Plaintiff / Appellant: CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, LESLIE BUNCHER, Dr., MICHELLE LAXSON and others
Intervenor: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae: MAJOR CITIES CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA POLICE CHIEFS' ASSOCIATION, ROBERT T. DOYLE, Marin County Sheriff and others
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and WILLIAM D. GORE, individually and in his capacity as Sheriff
Montana Shooting Sports Associ, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-36094
Plaintiff / Appellant: MONTANA SHOOTING SPORTS ASSOCIATION, GARY MARBUT and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.
Intervenor: STATE OF MONTANA and STEVE BULLOCK, Montana Attorney General
Amicus Curiae: GOLDWATER INSTITUTE, GUN OWNERS FOUNDATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
National Marine Fisheries Serv v. FERC
as 09-70770
Petitioner: NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICES
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
The State of Washington, Depar v. FERC
as 09-70477
Petitioner: THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
Columbia Riverkeeper, et al v. FERC
as 09-70442
Petitioner: COLUMBIA RIVERKEEPER, SIERRA CLUB, LANDOWNERS AND CITIZENS FOR A SAFE COMMUNITY and others
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION
State of Oregon v. FERC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-70269
Petitioner: STATE OF OREGON, by and through it's Department of Environmental Quality, Department of Land Conservation and Development, and Department of Energy
Respondent: FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: COASTAL STATES ORGANIZATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?