Cases 1 - 10 of 1,093
Salisbury v. Alexander et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Salisbury
Defendant:
Roderick Dante Alexander and Benin Logistics Group LLC
Other:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sewell v. Hanover Borough Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv01479
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Sewell
Defendant:
Hanover Borough Police Department and Zachariah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brigman v. Schaum et al
as 1:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
Lloyd James Brigman
Defendant:
Adam Schaum, Hellam Township Police Department, Pennsylvania State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLY et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05402
Plaintiff:
LLOYD G. BLY, JR. and KATHLEEN M. BLY
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. Covanta Plymouth Renewable Energy, LLC
as 2:2020cv04330
Plaintiff:
Holly Lloyd
Defendant:
Covanta Plymouth Renewable Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. MERCK & CO., INC et al
as 2:2020cv01726
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK & CO., INC, MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
LLOYD WALLACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDELL v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01640
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LLOYD LINDELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03567
Plaintiff:
CAROL BENNETT
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. LLOYD, II and J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Traynham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Lloyd S. Shaw and Mercer Transportation Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Willie Traynham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20233
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
Delilah Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
