Cases 11 - 20 of 12,014
McNeil v. Molnar, et al.
as 24-2733
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCNEIL
Defendant:
DAVE MOLNAR, Investigator General, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, WILLIAM GLASS, Sergeant and others
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Tolbert et al
as 3:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
William Tolbert individually doing business as Mikey Rich Barber Shop and Mikey Rich Barber Studio, LLC an unknown business doing business as Mikey Rich Barber Shop
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Hooper v. County of San Diego, et al.
as 24-2709
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HOOPER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM B. KOLENDER, Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities and others
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Williams v. O'Malley
as 24-2680
Plaintiff:
RACHEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
White v. Guardian Life Insurance Company, et al.
as 24-2681
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WHITE
Defendant:
GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE STAFFING RESOURCE GROUP, INC. GROUP ACCIDENTAL DEATH & DISMEMBERMENT PLAN and DOES 1-10
Klobus v. Akero Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Dora Klobus
Defendant:
Akero Therapeutics, Inc., Andrew Cheng, William White and others
John Doe v. Priscilla A. Madrid et al
as 8:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Priscilla A. Madrid, Thomas Vasquez, William Earl Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
as 24-2624
Plaintiff:
PETER SCHUMAN and WILLIAM COPLIN
Defendant:
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, ATMEL CORPORATION and ATMEL CORPORATION UNITED STATES SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
