Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
MARIN et al v. MORRIS
as 2:2022cv04714
Plaintiff: LUIS MARIN and MARIA MARIN
Defendant: WILLIAM SCOTT MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
MORRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51472
Plaintiff: WILLIAM H MORRIS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MORRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57131
Plaintiff: WILLIAM C MORRIS
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MORRIS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80091
Plaintiff: WILLIAM P. MORRIS
Defendant: GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv90359
Plaintiff: WILLIAM E. MORRIS, WILLIAM E. MORRIS, PAULA MORRIS and others
Defendant: A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
MORRIS v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC et al
as 2:2009cv69985
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. MORRIS
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC, AC&S, INC, ASARCO INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
BISHOP et al v. GUGLIOTTA et al
as 2:2007cv73709
Plaintiff: ANDREW J. BISHOP, HARRY R. CATSBAN, WILLIAM T. CRIBBS and others
Defendant: NORMAN J. GUGLIOTTA, LOUIE D. PARKER, COOPER INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BISHOP et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2007cv69221
Plaintiff: ANDREW J. BISHOP, HARRY R. CATSBAN, WILLIAM T. CRIBBS and others
Defendant: ACANDS INC, ALLIED-SIGNAL TRANSPORTATION INC., ALLIED-SIGNAL TRANSPORTATION INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?