Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Leftt et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2018cv03353
Plaintiff:
Andrew Leftt , Edward McConnin , Eugene Milanesi and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
William Nelson, IV v. David Welch, et al
as 11-1792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM G. NELSON, IV
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID K. WELCH and CRANE, HEYMAN, SIMON, WELCH & CLAR
Nelson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv07132
Plaintiff:
William G Nelson
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Sanitation, New York City Department Of Environmental Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101
William Nelson, IV v. David Welch, et al
as 08-2164
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM G. NELSON, IV
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID K. WELCH and CRANE, HEYMAN, SIMON, WELCH & CLAR
Repository Technologies Incorp v. William G. Nelson IV
as 08-1443
Debtor - Appellant:
In the Matter of: REPOSITORY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
Appellee:
WILLIAM G. NELSON, IV
Repository Technologies Incorp v. William G. Nelson, IV
as 08-1342
Debtor - Appellee:
In the Matter of: REPOSITORY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
Not Party - Appellant:
WILLIAM G. NELSON, IV
Nelson v. Welch et al
as 1:2007cv04825
Plaintiff:
William G. Nelson, IV
Defendant:
David K. Welch and Crane, Heyman, Simon, Welch & Clar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01857
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Nelson v. Repository Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00861
Plaintiff:
William G. Nelson, IV and William G. Nelson, IV
Defendant:
Repository Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
