Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Vides v. Wolf
as 20-3083
Petitioner:
Renen Vides
Respondent:
Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Jeffrey J. Searls, in his official capacity as Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Minaya-Rodriguez v. Barr
as 20-2178
Respondent / Appellee:
Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elvin M. Minaya-Rodriguez
Guerrero v. Decker
as 20-1646
Respondent / Appellee:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security, Attorney William P. Barr, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Idalia Guerrero
Guerrero v. Decker
as 20-1532
Respondent:
Attorney William P. Barr, in his official capacity as United States Attorney General, Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Idalia Guerrero
Joseph v. Decker
as 19-245
Undetermined:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robenson Guy Joseph, Matthew G. Whitaker, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
