Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 12,017
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff: MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant: I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Collins v. Sullivan
as 24-2342
Petitioner: CHASE LEE COLLINS
Respondent: WILLIAM SULLIVAN
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Olsen v. Key
as 24-2230
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM OLSEN
Respondent: JAMES KEY
Leadersel Innotech ESG v. ON24, Inc., et al.
as 24-2204
Plaintiff: LEADERSEL INNOTECH ESG
Defendant: ON24, INC., SHARAT SHARAN, STEVEN VATTUONE and others
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00044
Plaintiff: Center for Biological Diversity, Humane Society of The United States, Humane Society Legislative Fund and others
Defendant: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Raiser v. Gelmis, et al.
as 24-2163
Plaintiff: AARON RAISER
Defendant: SUSAN GELMIS, ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Western Watersheds Project et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2024cv00043
Plaintiff: Western Watersheds Project, International Wildlife Coexistence Network, WildEarth Guardians and others
Defendant: Martha Williams, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Taebel v. Trump, et al.
as 24-2125
Plaintiff: MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant: DONALD J. TRUMP, named as Donald Trump, former President of the United States, DOUG DUCEY, AZ Governor, MARK BRNOVICH, AZ Attorney General and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?