Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hastings v. Windstream Communications, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00009
Plaintiff:
Judith Hastings
Defendant:
Windstream Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Morgan et al v. CONEXIS Benefits Administrators, L.P. et al
as 5:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
Richard Morgan and Sharon Morgan
Defendant:
CONEXIS Benefits Administrators, L.P. , Windstream Communications, Inc. and United Healthcare of Kentucky, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Windstream Communication, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gary Smith
Defendant:
Windstream Communication, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowers v. Windstream Kentucky East, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00440
Plaintiff:
Dana Bowers and Dana Bowers
Defendant:
Windstream Kentucky East, LLC, Windstream Kentucky West, LLC and Windstream Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Windstream Communications, Inc. v. Creech Chevrolet Oldsmobile Buick Pontiac, Inc
as 6:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
Windstream Communications, Inc. and Windstream Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Creech Chevrolet Oldsmobile Buick Pontiac, Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Calhoun et al v. Charter Communications, LLC et al
as 6:2007cv00199
Plaintiff:
Martin Calhoun and Martin Calhoun
Defendant:
Charter Communications, LLC, Charter Communications, LLC and Windstream Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
