Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BUCKNER et al v. A-BEST PRODUCTS CO. et al
as 2:2009cv65348
Plaintiff:
LORETTA BUCKNER and HAZEL HILL
Defendant:
A-BEST PRODUCTS CO., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WOOD v. ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. et al
as 2:2009cv65798
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. WOOD
Defendant:
ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., SAFETY CLOTHING & EQUIPMENT CO., BENDIX AFTERMARKET BRAKE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARTLEY v. ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv65802
Plaintiff:
BEN C. HARTLEY
Defendant:
ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC., ATLAS ASBESTOS CORP., LTD., INTERNATIONAL TALC MANUFACTURING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Wendt, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 6:2001cv00680
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ona Wendt, Dawn Ackerman, Harold Ackerman and others
Not Classified By Court:
Terrence M. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Moye, et al v. The Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00155
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Upaco Adhesives, Inc., Elf-Atofina North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thelma Moye, Luisa Alvarez, Cher Curtis and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Ellenburg, et al v. Dow Chemical Co., et al
as 6:2000cv00153
Defendant:
Exxon Chemical Company Division of Exxon Mobil Corp., Imperial Chemical Industries, Upaco Adhesives, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ditmar Wendt, Connie Dickinson, Alma Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jay M. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
