Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Etta Hindra v. Deutsche Bank, et al
as 19-55079
Defendant / Appellee:
COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE, Beverly Hills North, DANNY HARVEY, Broker, WOLFE & WYMAN LLP and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ETTA HINDRA
In re: Salma Agha-Khan, et al v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-17262
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, CITIMORTGAGE INC. and others
In re: Salma Agha-Khan v. Bank of America, et al
as 17-71883
:
In re: SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Petitioner:
SALMA AGHA-KHAN, M.D.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
BRETT P. RYAN, JONATHAN J. DAMEN, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Madalene Tiggle-Lockhart v. MERS et al
as 5:2013cv01289
Cross Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Claiming Any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in the Property Described in the Complaint Adverse to Plaintiff's Title or Any Cloud on Plaintiff', Betty J Harris, Madalene Tiggle Lockhart and others
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Madalene Tiggle-Lockhart
Pines v. PNC Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Pines
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank N.A., Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
