Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Freedom Mortgage Corporation v. Etienne, Jr. et al
as 2:2023cv04135
Plaintiff:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Gerard Etienne, Jr., Hillary M Chancy and Woodmere Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Oriska Corporation v. Woodmere Rehabilitation and He
as 21-1560
Defendant:
Grandview Brokerage, Inc., John Doe, Broad Coverage Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Annette Hall, Alexi Arias, as the Class Representatives of a Class of Employees of Employer Defendants as the interests of the Class may appear, Karen Grant Williams and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Oriska Corporation, individually and derivatively to Carrier-Defendant Oriska Insurance Company
Oriska Corporation v. Woodmere Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02030
Defendant:
Mr. Benjamin Landa, Roberta Reardon, Grandview Brokerage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Oriska Corporation v. Woodmere Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, Inc. et al
as NYE/2:21-CV-02030
Defendant:
Woodmere Rehabilitation and Health Care Center, Inc, Roberta Reardon, Grandview Brokerage, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Oriska Corporation
Tamacas et al v. Woodmere Rehabilitation and Health Care Center Inc.
as 2:2015cv03435
Plaintiff:
Giselle Calvo, Sharrone Janet Francis, Sheldon Francis and others
Defendant:
Woodmere Rehabilitation and Health Care Center Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Eastchester Rehabilitaiton Health Care Center, LLC et al v. Bank Of America, N.A.
as 1:2010cv05192
Plaintiff:
1040 Central Avenue Realty, LLC, 949 Willoughby Real Estate LLC, Eastchester Rehabilitaiton Health Care Center, LLC and others
Defendant:
Bank Of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
