Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Harrell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated Regional Director, Corizon Health Inc Facility Medical Director, Corizon Health Inc Health Services Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pickering v. Corizon Health Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Randy Pickering and Randy Ray Pickering
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Correctional Officer Labbe, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Lieutenant, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Correctional Officer Russel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickering v. Corizon Health Administrator et al
as 0:2021cv00211
Defendant:
Corizon Health Administrator, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Pickering
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Lampert et al
as 2:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
JonMichael Guy
Defendant:
Robert Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Jeffie Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avitabile v. State of Wyoming et al
as 1:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Andrew J Avitabile
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Lampert, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Robert O Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeMillard v. Wyoming Department of Correction Medium Correctional Institution Therapist et al
as 2:2014cv00016
Plaintiff:
Eric Levanter DeMillard
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Correction Medium Correctional Institution Therapist, Richard Burton, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Psychiatrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
