Cases 51 - 60 of 129
McGee v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L P et al
as 1:2017cv01354
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGee
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals L P , X Y Z Generic Drug Manufacturer and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tappe v. Divers Institute of Technology Inc
as 5:2017cv01334
Defendant:
Divers Institute of Technology Inc and X Y Z Insurance Co
Plaintiff:
Jayne Tappe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Green v. Kroger Co et al
as 2:2017cv01184
Defendant:
X Y Z Insurance Co and Kroger Co
Plaintiff:
Kayla M Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ezell et al v. Medtronic P L C et al
as 3:2017cv00796
Plaintiff:
Wiley Ezell and Sherri Ezell
Defendant:
Medtronic P L C and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Courington v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2017cv00771
Plaintiff:
Shelly Courington
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fontenot v. Medtronic Inc
as 2:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
David Fontenot
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Erich William Wolf, II, Center for Neurosurgical & Spine Disorders L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lake Air Service L L C v. Kansas Aviation of Independence L L C
as 2:2017cv00681
Defendant:
Kansas Aviation of Independence L L C and X Y Z Insurance Co
Plaintiff:
Lake Air Service L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp et al
as 2:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Raymond Murray
Defendant:
Anadarko Petroleum Corp , Omni Energy Services Corp , Gulf South Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cabaniss et al v. Hobby Lobby Stores Inc
as 5:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Gayle Cabaniss and Fred Cabaniss
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores Inc and X Y Z Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Busby v. Texas Roadhouse Holding L L C et al
as 3:2016cv01467
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Holdings L L C , Texas Roadhouse Inc and X Y Z Insurance Co
Plaintiff:
Cassadee Busby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
