Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Chen v. Garland
as 23-1211
Petitioner:
XIAN LIN CHEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lin-Qi v. Barr
as 19-3264
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Xian Lin-Qi, AKA Xiang Lin-Qi, AKA Xiao Lin-Qi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06881
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Yang v. Tenzan Yuan Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv08179
Plaintiff:
Kun Yang
Defendant:
Mei Xian Lin and Tenzan Yuan Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lin-Qi v. Sessions
as 17-3203
Petitioner:
Xian Lin-Qi, AKA Xiang Lin-Qi, AKA Xiao Lin-Qi
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Cui v. East Palace One, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv06713
Plaintiff:
Ruixuan Cui
Defendant:
East Palace One, Inc., East Palace 43 Inc., East Palace 819 Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv11026
Plaintiff:
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. and Make-Up Art Cosmetics Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhao Yantao, Zixing Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07988
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhiqiang Zhao, zuzhishuai and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ji Xian Lin v. U.S. Attorney General
as 16-15138
Petitioner:
JI XIAN LIN
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
