Cases 1 - 10 of 15
CHEN v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2023cv11180
Plaintiff:
YEN-WEI CHEN
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and MERICK B GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
WU et al v. THE DOLAR SHOT RESTAURANT GROUP LLC et al
as 3:2019cv21774
Defendant:
TZU YEN CHEUNG, YU ZHANG, SUZIE ZHANG and others
Plaintiff:
FEI WU and JIE CHEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DENG et al v. THE DOLAR SHOP RESTAURANT GROUP LLC et al
as 3:2019cv21775
Defendant:
YU ZHANG, TZU YEN CHEUNG, SUZIE ZHANG and others
Plaintiff:
FENG YAY YENG, FENGYAN YANG, YUNJIE DENG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
CARLIN v. YEN et al
as 3:2016cv03039
Plaintiff:
MELANIE CARLIN
Defendant:
GARY L. YEN, M.D. and INNOVATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOH v. NORI O INC.
as 2:2016cv02811
Plaintiff:
JIT SHI GOH
Defendant:
NORI O INC., OTAYA SHUSHI II INC., PENG L. TAM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Carlin v. Gary L. Yen, M.D. et al
as 3:2016cv02303
Plaintiff:
Melanie Carlin
Defendant:
Gary L. Yen, M.D. and Innovative Pain Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOH v. NORI O INC. et al
as 2:2015cv07963
Defendant:
PENG L. TAM, YUK YEN CHAI, NORI O INC. doing business as SUSHI O and others
Plaintiff:
JIT SHI GOH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PHI-THAI NGO v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2015cv00625
Plaintiff:
YEN PHI-THAI NGO
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. WALOON INVESTMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02862
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
WALOON INVESTMENT, INC., GUO LEI WANG, ZHAO XIN LING and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
