Cases 11 - 17 of 17
LUCENT TECH V GATEWAY
as 08-1485
Amicus Curiae:
3M Company, Apple Inc., Bank of America Corporation and others
Defendant/Counterclaimant:
Dell, Inc.
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant:
Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant:
Multimedia Patent Trust
Oracle Corporation:
COMMONWEALTH SCIENT V BUFFALO TECH
as 07-1449
Amicus Curiae:
3Com Corporation, Accton Technology Corp. (Taiwan), Atheros Communications, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc. and Buffalo, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation
IN RE BILSKI
as 07-1130
Amicus Curiae:
Accenture, American Civil Liberties Union, American Express Company and others
Appellant:
Bernard L. Bilski and Rand A. Warsaw
Appellee:
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent And Trademark Office:
and
IN RE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY
as 06-M830
Amicus Curiae:
Adobe Systems, Inc., American Bar Association, American Intellectual Property Law Association and others
Respondent:
Convolve, Inc. and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Petitioner:
Seagate Technology, LLC
SHAW V BROADCAST.COM
as 06-1175
Defendant-Appellee:
BROADCAST.COM, INC. (now known as Yahoo!, Inc.), BROADCAST.COM, INC. (now known as Yahoo!, Inc.) and BROADCAST.COM, INC. (now known as Yahoo!, Inc.)
Plaintiff-Appellant:
STEVEN M. SHAW, VENSON M. SHAW, STEVEN M. SHAW and others
FANTASY SPORTS V SPORTSLINE
as 01-1217
Defendant-Appellee:
ESPN/STARWAVE PARTNERS (dba ESPN Internet Ventures & EIV Ven, SPORTSLINE.COM, INC., ESPN/STARWAVE PARTNERS (dba ESPN Internet Ventures & EIV Ven and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FANTASY SPORTS PROPERTIES, INC., FANTASY SPORTS PROPERTIES, INC. and FANTASY SPORTS PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
YAHOO! INC., YAHOO! INC. and YAHOO! INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
