Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jiang v. BlueCity Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2021cv04044
Plaintiff:
Junhui Jiang
Defendant:
BlueCity Holdings Limited, Baoli Ma, Zhiyong Li and others
Petitioner:
Shiyuan Zhu, Hui Yan Huang and Patrick Van der Schueren
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Huang v. Coven
as 1:2018cv01943
Plaintiff:
Feng Yan Huang
Defendant:
Phyllis Coven
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06671
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Peck v. Lihua International, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06540
Plaintiff:
William Peck
Defendant:
Jianhua Zhi, Daphne Yan Huang, Yaying Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffrey Grodko v. Lihua International Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Grodko
Defendant:
Lihua International Inc., Jianhua Zhu and Daphne Yan Huang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
