Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Denso Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12054
Plaintiff:
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant:
Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Incorporated, Fujikura, Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships et al v. Denso Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12018
Plaintiff:
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant:
Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Incorporated, Yazaki Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, et al v. Denso Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv12030
Plaintiff:
Group 1 Automotive, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Group 1 Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Asbury Automotive Group, Incorporated, as Assignee on Behalf of Asbury Automotive Wholly-owned Subsidiary Dealerships , Van Tuyl Group, LLC, as Assignee on Behalf of Assignor Dealerships and others
Defendant:
Denso Corporation, Denso International America, Incorporated, Continental Automotive Electronics LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California v. Yazaki Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv14073
Plaintiff:
State of California
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation and Yazaki North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. N.S. International, Ltd., et al
as 16-2086
:
In re: OCCUPANT SAFETY SYSTEMS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
OLEN YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC., LEAR CORPORATION and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2085
:
In re: WIRE HARNESSES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
OLEN YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2081
:
In re: WIRE HARNESSES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
BENJAMIN FEURY and THOMAS SARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2058
:
In re: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
BENJAMIN FEURY and THOMAS SARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2025
:
In re: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant:
OIEN YORK, AMY YORK and NANCY YORK
Defendant - Appellee:
NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Wire Harness - Heavy Equipment Trucks
as 2:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Denso Corp., Denso International America, Inc., Fujikura Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
