Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Yepez v. 3rd Avenue Dollar LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Luis Yepez
Defendant:
3rd Avenue Dollar LLC, Mamat Mazot and 3rd Avenue Dollar LLC doing business as 3rd Ave Dollar Store
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Yepez v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01371
Defendant:
BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sara Yepez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barragan Contreras v. Rosann Landscape Corp. et al
as 7:2017cv06453
Plaintiff:
Jose Barragan Contreras , Juan Alonzo Orellana , Jorge Yepez and others
Defendant:
Rosann Landscape Corp. , Rosann Land Improvement Ltd. , Ana Maria Birlescu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
O'Connor v. Gallagher's Famous, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv06055
Plaintiff:
Thomas O'Connor , Frank Smith , Fernando Yepez and others
Defendant:
Gallagher's Famous, LLC and Dean Poll
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
