Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Gentilini v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
David Alan Gentilini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beach v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00099
Defendant:
Wyoming Governor, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Deputy Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Beach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. CHS TX Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Delbert R McDowell
Defendant:
CHS TX Inc doing business as YesCare and Susanne S Levene MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Potter v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00246
Defendant:
Kurt Johnson, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Doctor, CHS TX Inc doing business as YesCare and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rathbun v. YesCare Corp
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Warren Rathbun
Defendant:
YesCare Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00177
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated Regional Director, Corizon Health Inc Facility Medical Director, Corizon Health Inc Health Services Administrator and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Harrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bird et al v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2022cv00152
Plaintiff:
Chester L Bird, Ryan A Brown and Richard B Dague
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Daniel Shannon, Michael Pacheco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
